Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!


FIT Critical Aspect of Airport Planning and Development Discussion

FIT Critical Aspect of Airport Planning and Development Discussion


Defend or refute the following statement and provide specific examples that support your position: “Experience shows that when an airport sponsor fails to consider environmental issues during the airport planning process, delays in the FAA environmental decision-making processes often occur.”

Aligned Objective

Discuss the environmental decision-making process

respond to at least two of your peers’ postings :

I will defend the statement. The evidence gathered from various airport expansion projects underscores the significant impact of neglecting environmental concerns during airport planning, leading to notable delays in the FAA ecological decision-making process. One illustrative case is the Denver International expansion in the 1990s. The initial development disregarded proper consideration of wetlands and wildlife habitats. Subsequently, legal challenges arose from environmental groups questioning the lack of due diligence. The ensuing litigations caused substantial setbacks, as the FAA had to address the shortcomings in the environmental assessment, inevitably prolonging the decision-making timeline. Similarly, the Chicago O’hare international airport modernization in the 2000s confronted significant delays due to the failure to adequately assess the potential impacts on noise and air quality for neighboring communities. Inadequate evaluations prompted legal actions and public outcry, compelling the airport sponsor and the FAA to reevaluate and rectify the environmental oversight, leading to the protracted approval process.

Moreover, the San Diego International Airport Terminal 2 expansion faced delays during the 2010s due to inadequate consideration of the ecological impact on adjacent wetlands and coastal ecosystems. Regulatory bodies deemed the initial environmental assessments inadequate, necessitating revisions and additional evaluations. These revisions not only led to time-consuming modifications but also sparked community protests and further legal challenges, resulting in significant postponements in the FAA’s decision-making process. The ongoing debate over the proposed Heathrow Airport third runway expansion serves as another compelling example. Environmental concerns, including noise pollution and air quality, have triggered legal actions and public demonstrations. These environmental issues, which were initially not given sufficient attention, compelled authorities to revisit the planning and conduct more comprehensive environmental assessments. As a result, the decision-making process has been considerably delayed. In each of these cases, the correlation between inadequate consideration of environmental issues during airport planning and subsequent delays in FAA environmental decision-making processes is evident. Legal challenges, regulatory interventions, and the need for revised assessments all contribute to these delays.

In conclusion, empirical evidence from multiple airport projects demonstrates that a failure to integrate environmental considerations during the planning phase consistently leads to delays in the FAA’s environmental decision-making processes. These experiences underscore the importance of proactive and comprehensive environmental assessments in ensuring timely and successful airport expansion projects while upholding environmental sustainability.


I strongly support the assertion that “Experience shows that when an airport sponsor fails to consider environmental issues during the airport planning process, delays in the FAA environmental decision-making processes often occur.” Environmental considerations are not just a peripheral concern but an integral and critical aspect of airport planning and development. The repercussions of neglecting these concerns can be profound, leading to disruptive delays in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) environmental decision-making processes.

In 2021, aviation officials unveiled a grand project to expand the Oakland International Airport. However, local environmentalists have emerged as vocal opponents of the proposal, vehemently contesting that such an expansion would significantly exacerbate the ongoing climate emergency. Their argument stems from the belief that large-scale expansions like the one proposed are compounding the very issues responsible for driving climate change and inflicting irreparable harm on our environment.

An influential voice in this discourse is the Stop OAK Expansion Coalition, which asserts that aviation accounted for a staggering 11% of greenhouse gas emissions in the Bay Area in 2019. These statistics underscore the urgent need for conscientious decision-making in airport expansion projects. The responsibility lies on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to diligently fulfill the mandates outlined in The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This requires them to ensure that airport sponsors undertake comprehensive and thorough environmental impact assessments. Moreover, when these assessments pinpoint potential environmental impacts, it is imperative that mitigation measures are developed during the planning phase.

These steps are not merely procedural. They are vital to evading a host of potential issues. It is on the part of the FAA to fulfill the requirements of The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by ensuring that airport sponsors have conducted a thorough environmental impact assessment, and where environmental impacts are identified, mitigation measures are formulated to minimize or offset those impacts during the planning process, to avoid future legal challenges, public opposition, and a more prolonged decision-making process.


Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Writers Hero only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Writers Hero are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Writers Hero is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Writers Hero, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.