Description
Prompt
Assess the compliance approach implemented by Trinity Industries in order to recommend a cost efficient software system.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Bottom-Up Approach
- What were the strengths and weaknesses of Trinity’s practice-based bottom-up approach? How effective was it?
- What would you recommend it should have done differently in Year 1? Defend your response.
- Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of a bottom-up versus a top-downrisk approach to compliance.
- Which approach is more appropriate in completing a compliance project successfully for Trinity’s first year?
- How does each approach affect a company’s internal control structure?
- Identify the chief insights from the pilot project. How does the pilot project for the EDP system compare to SOX requirements?
- Identify the testing processes Trinity performed and whether Trinity took the appropriate approach in designing their controls.
- Based on the substantive tests, which testing process proved to be most useful in assessing Trinity’s accounting system?
- Compose a short memorandum that communicates the results of the first year of testing along with recommendations as to what Trinity should do differently in subsequent years.
- SOX-Related Expenses
- Formulate recommendations for how Trinity could further reduce SOX-related expenses in 2008. Be sure to consider the barriers the company may encounter with each of your recommendations.
- What are the major sources of cost in Trinity’s compliance maintenance and testing?
- Rank each of the major sources of cost in terms of value.
- Compare the choice of Oracle as the selected software system against two other systems of comparable size and scope. Evaluate each software system’s advantages and disadvantages.
- If you determine that another software system would have been a better choice through your analysis, defend the decision. If Oracle is the choice after analysis, defend that decision.