Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

PHI103 WEEK 5 Assignment FOR SUZIKANE08 ONLY!!!!!

PHI103 WEEK 5 Assignment FOR SUZIKANE08 ONLY!!!!!

PHI103.W5A1.10.2013

Description:

Total Possible Score: 10.00

 

Identifies the Issue That Is Addressed in the Argument

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Clearly and accurately identifies the issue that is addressed in the argument.

Proficient – Accurately identifies the issue that is addressed in the argument. The identification is slightly unclear or imprecise.

Basic – Identifies the issue that is addressed in the argument. The identification is unclear or imprecise.

Below Expectations – Misidentifies the issue that is addressed in the argument. The identification is significantly unclear, imprecise, and/or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – The identification of the issue that is addressed in the argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Explains the Argument and Identifies the Premises and Conclusions

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Accurately explains the argument and clearly identifies all relevant premises and conclusions.

Proficient – Accurately explains the argument and identifies most relevant premises and conclusions.

Basic – Explains the argument and identifies some relevant premises and conclusions. The explanation may be somewhat unclear or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Inaccurately and/or unclearly explains the argument and identifies few or no relevant premises and conclusions.

Non-Performance – The explanation of the argument and the identification of the relevant premises and conclusions are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Evaluates the Argument’s Validity, Soundness, and/or Strength

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Accurately and clearly evaluates the argument. The evaluation includes proper identification of inductive or deductive reasoning as well as validity, soundness, and/or strength where applicable.

Proficient – Accurately evaluates the argument. The evaluation includes proper identification of inductive or deductive reasoning as well as validity, soundness, and/or strength where applicable. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Evaluates the argument. The evaluation includes identification of inductive or deductive reasoning as well as validity, soundness, and/or strength, but relevant details are missing, unclear, or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Inaccurately and/or unclearly evaluates the argument. The evaluation may not identify inductive or deductive reasoning, validity, soundness, and/or strength.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of the argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Creates a Counterargument With Supporting Premises

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Creates a clear counterargument with supporting premises that are fully grounded in logical reasoning and/or factual evidence. The counterargument is strong if inductive, and valid and sound if deductive.

Proficient – Creates a mostly clear counterargument with supporting premises that are adequately grounded in logical reasoning and/or factual evidence. The counterargument is strong if inductive, and valid and sound if deductive.

Basic – Creates a counterargument with supporting premises that are partially grounded in logical reasoning and/or factual evidence. The counter-argument contains relevant errors in the use of induction or deduction, which somewhat compromise the argument’s strength, validity, and/or soundness.

Below Expectations – Attempts to create a counterargument with supporting premises; however, the counter-argument lacks logical reasoning and factual evidence and includes significant errors in the use of induction or deduction, which compromise the argument’s strength, validity, and/or soundness.

Non-Performance – The creation of a counterargument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Identifies a Weakness in the Original Argument and Critiques That Weakness

Total: 1.10

Distinguished – Clearly identifies a weakness in the original argument and critiques that weakness using factual evidence and/or logical reasoning.

Proficient – Identifies a weakness in the original argument and critiques that weakness using factual evidence and/or logical reasoning. The identification and/or critique are slightly unclear.

Basic – Identifies a weakness in the original argument and partially critiques that weakness using logical reasoning and/or factual evidence. The identification and/or critique are unclear or do not directly relate to weaknesses in the original argument.

Below Expectations – Attempts to identify a weakness in the original argument and critique that weakness; however, the identification and critique are unclear and/or do not relate to weaknesses in the original argument.

Non-Performance – The identification of a weakness in the original argument and the critique of that weakness are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Word Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.  

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

APA Formatting

Total: 0.70

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Resource Requirement

Total: 0.70

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 
Powered by Powered by Logo
Week 5 – Final Project
Assignment

Final Project

Please read the instructions below for information on how to complete this assignment. 

For a list of resources that are specific to this assignment, please utilize the “Resources Tab” located below.

If you feel that you need help with any of the main topics for this week, please revisit the Practice Activities located in the Weekly Overview.

In your written component of the Final Project, you will analyze an argument in relation to a specific issue. Then, you will respond to that argument by providing a counterargument. Please choose one reading or media artifact from the Final Project Argument Options. Be sure to choose an issue in which you are interested and for which you have enough factual evidence to create a strong argument.

Complete the steps below based on your chosen argument:

Step One: Evaluate the Argument 

  1. Identify the issue that is addressed in the argument.
  2. Explain the argument and identify the premises and conclusions.
  3. Evaluate the argument.
    • If the argument has a deductive component, is it valid and sound? Why?
    • If the argument has an inductive component, is it strong or weak? Why?
    • Remember that arguments often contain both inductive and deductive components. Do your best to identify all the arguments that are used to support the position presented in the piece.


Step Two: Create a Counterargument 

  1. Create a counterargument to the original argument.
    • Present premises that support your own position while also pointing out the weaknesses inherent in the original argument. Avoid the use of fallacious reasoning and anecdotal evidence.
    • If you are using inductive arguments, make sure that they are strong. If you are using deductive arguments, make sure that they are valid and attempt to provide sound premises.
    • Use factual evidence and/or logical support from at least three scholarly sources to support your argument.
    • This might require you to play “devil’s advocate.” Remember that you do not need to agree with the position for which you argue. You may need to take on an opposing position to your own personal view and argue from that position. Critical thinkers are able to take on opposing perspectives and identify the strongest arguments from those perspectives.

 
Choose one of the options below to present your argument evaluation and counterargument. 

  1. Written Assignment
    • Must be 1100 to 1400 words in length, excluding the title page and reference page(s).
    • Must include at least three scholarly sources to support the counterargument.
    • Must be formatted according to APA 6th edition style guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. PowerPoint Presentation
    • Must be 10 to 12 slides in length, excluding the title slide and reference slide(s). You must also include an audio voice-over transcript or slide notes totaling between 1100 and1400 words.
    • The presentation, transcript, and/or slide notes must include APA-style references (in-text and on the reference slide) for at least three scholarly sources supporting the counter-argument.
    • Must be formatted according to APA 6th edition style guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    • Feel free to use images that enhance the presentation and contribute to it. However, remember that images are not a substitute for the content that must be presented in slide notes or audio voice-over.
  3. Video Presentation using Present.me (https://present.me/content/)
    • Must be five to ten minutes in length (no longer than ten minutes) and, include a voice-over component. At the beginning of the presentation, include the title page content listed below under the “Writing the Final Project” guidelines.
    • Must provide a transcript of the video content that is between 1100 and 1400 words, including APA-style references (in-text and on the reference page(s)) to at least three academic sources supporting the counter-argument.
    • Feel free to use images that enhance the presentation and contribute to it. However, remember that images are not a substitute for the content that must be presented in your audio voice-over.
    • To submit your work, copy and paste the URL to your video into a Word document along with your transcript. Include your name and date, and submit the assignment using the Assignment Submission button in the online classroom.
    • For help with using Present.me, use these resources.

The Ashford Writing Center (AWC)  has two kinds of tutoring available to you.

  • Live Chat – If you have writing-related questions about a topic before you draft a discussion post or submit a written assignment, you will now be able to chat live with a tutor for a short (up to 20 minute) conversation. Live Chat will be available Monday through Friday from 10:00-11:00 am and 4:00-5:00 pm (PST). AWC Live Chat
  • Email Paper Review – If you have a draft, partial draft, or even if you’re having trouble getting started, you can complete a submission form and email your paper to the AWC for review.
    • Writing Tutors will do their best to return your paper with their comments within 48 hours, not including Saturdays and Sundays. Please plan accordingly if you would like to receive feedback before an assignment due date. AWC Email Paper Review

Writing the Final Project
The Final Project:

  1. Must be 1100 to 1400 words in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. Must include a title page/slide with the following:
    1. Title of project
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introduction that has a succinct thesis statement.
  4. Must address the topic of the project with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  6. Must use at least three scholarly sources, including a minimum of three from the Ashford University Library.
  7. Must document all sources in APA 6th edition style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  8. Must include a separate reference page/slide that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Late Policy: Written assignments (essays, journals, presentations) are due on the specified days in the course. Written assignments will be subject to a late penalty of up to 10% per day up to three days late. If written assignments are submitted after 72 hours past the due date, instructors can give a penalty up to and including a grade of 0 for the assignment.

 

Resources


Required Resources

Article

  1. Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2013). How to write an argumentative essay [Unpublished work]. College of Liberal Arts, Ashford University, Clinton, IA.
    • This document explains how students can effectively present a philosophical argument.
 
 

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Writers Hero only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Writers Hero are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Writers Hero is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Writers hero, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.